📊 Full opportunity report: AMÁLIA · The Three Hard Questions. on ThorstenMeyerAI.com — validation score, market gap, and execution plan.

TL;DR

Portugal’s AMÁLIA, a €5.5 million European Portuguese LLM, is now operational but faces three critical questions about its openness, native data, and objectives. These issues highlight broader challenges in Europe’s sovereign AI efforts.

Portugal’s €5.5 million investment in the AMÁLIA large language model has resulted in a functional, publicly accessible model that outperforms previous open models on European Portuguese benchmarks. However, critical questions about the model’s openness, native-language data, and strategic objectives remain unanswered, posing broader challenges for Europe’s sovereign AI initiatives.

AMÁLIA was developed through a consortium involving approximately 60 researchers across Portugal’s top institutions, including NOVA, IST, and IT. The project was announced in December 2024, with the base version completed by September 2025 and publicly launched in October 2025. The model is currently available to 450,000 academic users via the FCT’s IAedu platform, with knowledge limited to the end of 2023.

Technically, AMÁLIA is a continuation of the EuroLLM multilingual foundation, not trained from scratch, with a focus on Portuguese. It outperforms previous open models on Portuguese benchmarks and beats Qwen 3-8B on most tests, although it still lags behind on certain benchmarks like ALBA. The project’s final version is scheduled for release in June 2026, with ongoing development and evaluation.

Despite these advancements, Duarte O.Carmo’s analysis highlights three pressing questions: How open is ‘fully open’ in practice? How much native-language data is sufficient? What should the model optimize for? These questions are central to evaluating the strategic and technical success of the project and broader European efforts.

AMÁLIA · The Three Hard Questions.
DISPATCH / MAY 2026 ESSAY · EUROPEAN SOVEREIGN LLMs · AMÁLIA · PT-PT
▲ Standalone Essay EU Sovereign AI · May 2026
Standalone Essay · European Sovereign AI · The AMÁLIA Case Study

AMÁLIA
The three hard
questions.

Portugal spent €5.5M to build a European Portuguese LLM. The base version is operational, the benchmarks beat Qwen 3-8B on most pt-PT tasks. So why are the most important questions still unanswered?

Last month, Duarte O.Carmo published the sharpest public analysis of AMÁLIA — Portugal’s state-funded European Portuguese large language model. He prefaces his critique with the necessary diplomatic apparatus before doing what almost nobody else in the European-sovereign-LLM discourse has been willing to do publicly: asking hard questions about whether the work, as released, actually does what it set out to do. This piece is a structural extension of his analysis. The AMÁLIA case study exposes three hard questions every national LLM effort needs to answer publicly — and the broader European sovereign-LLM movement has been operating without explicit answers to any of them.

▲ The structural editorial finding
The European sovereign-LLM movement is a real, important, underexamined structural phenomenon — and the public discourse around it is still treating individual model launches as the unit of analysis rather than the structural pattern they collectively form. €100M+ in publicly disclosed European funding deserves the discourse Duarte O.Carmo’s analysis models. The questions are real. They have answers. The answers determine whether the agenda succeeds.
— standalone essay · the AMÁLIA case study · may 2026
€5.5M
Portuguese government investment · December 2024 announcement
60 researchers across NOVA · IST · IT · FCT consortium · 450K academic users via IAedu
5.5%
Clearly pt-PT share of 107B extended pre-training tokens
5.8B Arquivo.pt tokens · EuroLLM base mixture pt-PT share not cleanly disclosed
Qwen>AMÁLIA
Qwen 3-8B still beats AMÁLIA on ALBA · team’s own pt-PT benchmark
AMÁLIA beats Qwen on most other pt-PT tasks · the structural paradox
Jun2026
Final version target · the strategic positioning moment
Base completed Sep 30 2025 · final June 2026 will determine structural answer
AMÁLIA €5.5M PORTUGUESE GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT · 60 RESEARCHERS · NOVA / IST / IT / FCT · BASE OPERATIONAL · FINAL JUNE 2026 Q1 · OPENNESS “FULLY OPEN SOURCE” CLAIM VS OLMO OPERATIONAL STANDARD · WEIGHTS / DATA / LOGS NOT YET PUBLIC Q2 · DATA 107B EXTENDED PRE-TRAINING · 5.8B CLEARLY pt-PT (5.5%) · QWEN 3-8B BEATS AMÁLIA ON ALBA Q3 · OPTIMIZATION LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE VS COUNTRY-KNOWLEDGE DEPTH · STRUCTURAL POSITIONING QUESTION EU LANDSCAPE ITALIAN MINERVA · GERMAN ALEPH ALPHA · FRENCH MISTRAL · OPENEUROLLM CONSORTIUM · SWISS APERTUS CLOSING THE EU SOVEREIGN AI AGENDA IS A SERIOUS PROJECT THAT DESERVES SERIOUS PUBLIC DISCOURSE · O.CARMO MODELS WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE AMÁLIA €5.5M · 60 RESEARCHERS · ~5.5% pt-PT IN MID-TRAINING · JUNE 2026 STRATEGIC MOMENT
The three hard questions · structural extension of O.Carmo

Three questions every national LLM effort needs to answer publicly.

Duarte O.Carmo’s framing maps cleanly onto the structural argument. Each question lands specifically in AMÁLIA — and the broader European sovereign-LLM movement has been operating without explicit answers to any of them.

The three hard questions · what AMÁLIA reveals about national LLM development
Each question is sourced from O.Carmo’s analysis. Each generalizes beyond AMÁLIA to every European sovereign-LLM project. The June 2026 final release is the moment several of these resolve — for AMÁLIA specifically and as precedent for the movement.
▲ Question 01 · Openness
How open is “fully open,” really?
FINDING: Technical report claims “fully open source.” As of mid-May 2026: weights, training data, training logs NOT public. Only Arquivo.pt processing scripts open.
The Olmo standard: weights + data + code + training logs all open. AMÁLIA currently sits closer to “open weights” (not even fully that yet) than “open source.” The European sovereign-LLM movement’s structural position depends on operational openness being real, not just marketing.
O.CARMO“Maybe it’s a matter of time. Maybe it’s research-in-progress.”
▲ Question 02 · Data
How much native-language data is enough?
FINDING: 5.8B pt-PT / 107B total = 5.5% in mid-training. SFT 17-18%. Qwen 3-8B still beats AMÁLIA on ALBA — the team’s own headline pt-PT benchmark.
The Minerva comparison: Italy trained from scratch on ~500B IT+EN tokens. Order of magnitude more native-language exposure. Continuation pre-training on multilingual foundation may not produce sufficient specialization to beat scale-advantaged general models on the very benchmark designed to favor specialization.
O.CARMO“How much more could we benefit from additional pre-training data in Portuguese?”
▲ Question 03 · Optimization
What should we be optimizing for?
FINDING: Benchmarks measure grammar / syntax / pt-PT/pt-BR bias / general knowledge in Portuguese. Missing dimension: does the model know more about Portugal than larger frontier models?
The strategic position: sovereign-LLM competitive structural position is not “match frontier on overall capability” but “exceed frontier on country-specific knowledge depth.” “What’s the most famous dessert in Aveiro? Who was president of Portugal 1978-1985?” Current benchmarks don’t measure this.
O.CARMO“A model smaller, but with much more intrinsic knowledge about Portugal.”

The three questions form a structural feedback loop. Q3 (optimization target) determines Q2 (data volume needed) which conditions Q1 (openness sufficient for community contribution). The European sovereign-LLM movement collectively benefits from these questions becoming standard methodology disclosure, not exceptional critique.

The data accounting · the empirical center of Question 02
Universal Language (Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, etc.) Plan of Salvation Teaching Kit Gift for Missionaries, Youth or Family Home Evening Teaching Tool

Universal Language (Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, etc.) Plan of Salvation Teaching Kit Gift for Missionaries, Youth or Family Home Evening Teaching Tool

Includes 15 durable wood pieces

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

107 billion tokens. 5.8 billion clearly pt-PT.

The structurally tractable question with a structurally surprising answer. For a model whose entire stated purpose is European Portuguese prioritization, the native-language share of extended pre-training is 5.5%. The implications cascade into every other question.

AMÁLIA extended pre-training composition · token accounting
From the AMÁLIA technical report (Vieira et al., arXiv 2603.26511) and O.Carmo’s analysis. EuroLLM base mixture pt-PT share is not cleanly disclosed — that portion may contain additional Portuguese data of unclear pt-PT vs pt-BR composition.
Extended pre-training: 107B tokens total
5.8B clearly pt-PT · 5.5% From Arquivo.pt Portuguese national web archive. The only cleanly identified European Portuguese component of the AMÁLIA-specific training mixture.
101.2B EuroLLM base mixture · 94.5% Multilingual European foundation. Contains some Portuguese — but pt-PT vs pt-BR composition not cleanly disclosed. Methodologically the structurally important opacity.
▲ The Qwen 3-8B paradox · what it suggests structurally
Qwen 3-8B — Alibaba multilingual general-purpose model with no specific European Portuguese training emphasis — outperforms AMÁLIA on ALBA, the team’s own headline pt-PT benchmark. Scale advantage may compensate for specialization gap when specialization is only 5.5% of training mixture.
The openness comparison · the empirical center of Question 01
Large Language Models: The Hard Parts: Open Source AI Solutions for Common Pitfalls

Large Language Models: The Hard Parts: Open Source AI Solutions for Common Pitfalls

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Olmo standard. AMÁLIA’s current state.

Allen Institute for AI’s Olmo project defines what “fully open” operationally requires. Olmo doesn’t lead frontier benchmarks. That’s not the point. The point is to be the structural reference for openness. AMÁLIA’s “fully open source” claim should track to the operational standard.

What “fully open” means · five operational dimensions
The Olmo standard versus AMÁLIA current release status as of mid-May 2026. The June 2026 final release will determine which structural position AMÁLIA ultimately stakes — and sets precedent for every subsequent European national-LLM project.
▲ Dimension
▲ OLMO STANDARDAllen Institute for AI
▲ AMÁLIA CURRENTAs of mid-May 2026
Weights
✓ OPENPublic download · every checkpoint
✗ NOT YETNot publicly available
Training data
✓ OPENFull corpus inspectable
✗ NOT YETArquivo.pt-derived dataset not public
Training code
✓ OPENFull infrastructure
◐ PARTIALOnly Arquivo.pt processing scripts
Training logs
✓ OPENReproducible run analysis
✗ NOT YETNot publicly available
Methodology
✓ OPENOperational-level disclosure
◐ ACADEMICarXiv-report level, not operational
The fair reading: AMÁLIA is research-in-progress. Final version targets June 2026 — weights may release with that. The team likely has legitimate reasons (review, licensing, infrastructure) for current state. The structural critique is not “they’re hiding the weights.” It is that “fully open source” is a specific claim with specific operational meaning, and the movement collectively benefits from holding the claim to that standard. Olmo defines it. National LLM projects should match it.
The European sovereign-LLM landscape · strategic positioning
Training Data for Machine Learning: Human Supervision from Annotation to Data Science

Training Data for Machine Learning: Human Supervision from Annotation to Data Science

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Four strategic positions. AMÁLIA between two and three.

Approximately €100M+ in publicly disclosed European sovereign-LLM funding across the major initiatives. The structural question every project faces: what is the actual competitive position you’re staking? Four options — none mutually exclusive — but each requiring different commitments.

European sovereign-LLM landscape · four strategic positions
Italian Minerva, German Aleph Alpha, French Mistral, OpenEuroLLM consortium, Swiss Apertus, Italian Velvet, AI Sweden, Norwegian-LLM efforts, plus AMÁLIA. Each stakes a different combination of these positions. The competitive structural position is the one each project is willing to commit to operationally.
▲ POSITION 01 · GENERAL CAPABILITY
Match the frontier on overall benchmarks
The bet: European compute, European data, European talent can match US/Chinese frontier scale. Structurally hard — requires substantial compute and talent retention against US compensation packages.
PLAYERSOpenEuroLLM consortium · Mistral · partially Velvet · scale-investment dependent
▲ POSITION 02 · SOVEREIGNTY · OPENNESS
Exceed on compliance · data sovereignty · openness
The bet: European enterprises and governments will pay capability premium for sovereign deployment. Plausible but structurally fragile if capability gap grows beyond sovereignty premium can compensate.
PLAYERSAleph Alpha · OpenEuroLLM · AMÁLIA (partial via “fully open” claim) · regulatory-readiness dependent
▲ POSITION 03 · COUNTRY-KNOWLEDGE DEPTH
Exceed on cultural · historical · linguistic depth
The bet: “this model knows more about my country than frontier models do.” Structurally defensible — but requires country-specific knowledge benchmarks and training data investment current projects haven’t fully deployed.
PLAYERSMinerva (explicit, ~500B IT+EN from scratch) · AMÁLIA (partial via benchmarks, not yet via data) · O.Carmo’s argued direction
▲ POSITION 04 · APPLICATION SPECIALIZATION
Vertical depth in regulated industries
The bet: healthcare, legal, finance, government — country-specific specialization in regulated industries where sovereignty + capability combine. Probably most commercially viable but requires deep vertical integration.
PLAYERSMistral · Velvet (Almawave) · Aleph Alpha · commercial actors · vertical-integration dependent
▲ Where AMÁLIA actually positions · the unresolved question
Current AMÁLIA release sits between Positions 02 and 03 without clearly committing to either. Openness claim partially supports 02. Benchmark architecture partially supports 03. The June 2026 final release will be the strategic moment. Releasing as truly fully open with substantially more pt-PT training data and country-knowledge benchmarking stakes a clear 02+03 position.
Closing argument · what national LLM efforts should hold themselves to
OpenAI Evals Cookbook: Designing Benchmarks for Product‑Grade LLM Features

OpenAI Evals Cookbook: Designing Benchmarks for Product‑Grade LLM Features

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Three standards. For AMÁLIA and the movement.

The structural critique generalizes beyond AMÁLIA. Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland, the OpenEuroLLM consortium, and every subsequent national project benefit from public discourse holding national LLM efforts to operational standards on openness, data accounting, and strategic positioning.

Three standards · what European sovereign-LLM efforts should adopt
Each standard generalizes from AMÁLIA to the movement. None is unreasonable. All are already met by some comparable project (Minerva, Olmo, Apertus). The argument is for these standards becoming norms across all European sovereign-LLM efforts.
01Openness
Hold “fully open source” claims to operational standards
Olmo defines the standard. National LLM projects claiming the same status should match the operational release, not just the marketing positioning. The European sovereign-LLM movement’s competitive position against US/Chinese frontier developers depends on the openness differentiator being real, not just marketed.
02Data
Publish complete native-language data accounting
“How much pt-PT is in this model” should be answerable from the public documentation. The norm exists in Minerva, Olmo, Apertus, and other comparable projects. National LLM projects should adopt clean data composition disclosure as standard methodology — not an exceptional ask.
03Target
Optimize explicitly for country-specific knowledge depth
The competitive structural position for sovereign LLMs is “this model knows more about my country than the frontier models do.” Building the benchmarks, training data, and evaluation infrastructure for that target requires explicit commitment. Linguistic competence is necessary but not sufficient; cultural-knowledge depth is the defensible position.

The European sovereign-AI agenda is a serious strategic project that deserves serious public discourse. O.Carmo’s analysis is what serious public discourse looks like. Appropriately diplomatic. Structurally rigorous. Willing to ask the hard questions in public when the public investment justifies it. More of this is needed — across every European sovereign-LLM project, not just AMÁLIA.

— Standalone Essay · The AMÁLIA case study · May 2026
Source dossier · the receipts
Colophon · Standalone Essay

Set in Source Serif 4 (display), EB Garamond (essay body), IBM Plex Sans & IBM Plex Mono. Standalone essay register · not part of the security franchise. Free to embed with attribution.

thorstenmeyerai.com

Standalone essay · European sovereign AI · the AMÁLIA case study · May 2026

€5.5M · 5.5% · Q3 unresolved · Jun 2026

Implications for European Sovereign AI Strategies

The AMÁLIA project exemplifies the challenges faced by European countries in developing independent, native-language AI models. The unresolved questions about openness, native data sufficiency, and strategic goals influence national policies, resource allocation, and Europe’s position in global AI development. Addressing these issues is crucial for building trustworthy, transparent, and effective AI systems that serve local languages and communities.

European Sovereign-Language Model Initiatives and Challenges

Across Europe, nations like Italy, Germany, France, and Nordic countries are investing in sovereign-language models, often with similar structural and strategic questions. Many projects, including Italy’s Minerva and France’s Mistral, are at early stages, with ongoing debates about whether to train from scratch or adapt multilingual foundations. The European Union’s push for independent AI capabilities underscores the importance of addressing core questions of openness, native data, and purpose, which remain largely unresolved in the current landscape.

“The three questions about openness, native data, and objectives are fundamental to understanding the true state and potential of European sovereign models.”

— Duarte O.Carmo

Unanswered Questions About AMÁLIA’s Openness and Strategy

It remains unclear how open AMÁLIA truly is in practice, especially regarding access to training data and model weights. The sufficiency of native Portuguese data for future improvements is also uncertain, as the current dataset comprises a relatively small proportion of native content. Additionally, the strategic goals—whether the model is meant to serve as a national AI asset or a research prototype—are still under discussion, with no definitive public stance from the developers.

Next Steps for AMÁLIA and European Sovereign Models

The final version of AMÁLIA is scheduled for June 2026, with ongoing evaluations and potential updates based on benchmarking and community feedback. European projects will likely face increased scrutiny regarding transparency and data policies, prompting public discussions about openness and purpose. The coming months will also reveal how these models perform in real-world applications and whether they can meet strategic national and regional AI goals.

Key Questions

What are the main technical features of AMÁLIA?

AMÁLIA is a continuation of the EuroLLM multilingual foundation, trained on approximately 107 billion tokens, with a focus on European Portuguese. It outperforms previous open models on Portuguese benchmarks and is designed for multimodal capabilities in future versions.

Why are the questions about openness and native data important?

These questions determine how transparent, trustworthy, and effective the model can be. Openness affects access and collaboration, while native data sufficiency impacts the model’s accuracy and cultural relevance.

What is the broader significance of these issues for Europe?

Addressing these questions is vital for Europe’s goal of developing independent, culturally aligned AI systems that can compete globally and serve regional needs without over-reliance on non-European models.

When will we see the final version of AMÁLIA?

The final version is expected in June 2026, after further testing, benchmarking, and potential adjustments based on ongoing research and feedback.

Are there similar projects in other European countries?

Yes, countries like Italy, France, Germany, and Nordic nations are pursuing their own sovereign-language models, facing similar structural and strategic questions as Portugal with AMÁLIA.

Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com

You May Also Like

AI Companions: The Rise of Virtual Friends and What It Means for Us

AI companions are evolving into sophisticated virtual friends that can understand emotions,…

AI in Everyday Gadgets: 5 Cool Examples of Smarter Tech

Discover how AI transforms everyday gadgets into smarter tools that adapt to your needs—see the five coolest examples that will change your daily routine.

The adder at the heart of Intel’s 8087 floating-point chip

An in-depth look at the 69-bit adder at the core of Intel’s 8087 floating-point coprocessor and its significance in computing history.

Future of Work: How Tech Gadgets Are Changing Our Office Life

Some innovative tech gadgets are revolutionizing office life, but discover how they will shape your future workspace experiences.