🔍 Read the full analysis: How Gewerkton Brought AI Agents Into Its Two-Day Brand Rebuild on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
TL;DR
Gewerkton says AI coding agents implemented its HORIZON redesign across its web and phone apps, Studio, icons and a 529-page website on Oct. 2–3, 2026. The company’s founder approved the plans and releases, checked visual work and intervened when tests missed problems; the account also records failed film runs and unresolved Android issues.
Gewerkton says it completed a two-day redesign on Oct. 2 and 3, 2026, using AI coding agents to implement a new visual identity across its web app, phone apps, Studio, icons and multilingual website. The company’s founder, Thorsten Meyer, approved the written plans, inspected results and released each part, making the project a reported example of agents carrying out implementation under human review rather than independently deciding what to ship, as detailed in the original analysis.
The redesign, named HORIZON, changed the web app’s colour system and 47 cards, updated phone app version 0.5.0 for iPhone and Android, and applied the new look to Studio in light and dark modes. Gewerkton says all 26 icons were re-rendered in Blender, while its website was updated across 529 pages in 40 languages. The company reports uploading 1,583 files without an error.
The website work also included 228 AI film runs for five regions, eight help videos and regional versions for most of the runs. The company says 222 runs had their own regional version. Its description qualifies the two-day timeline: a draft of the design from Sept. 26 was used, so Oct. 2–3 covered execution from an approved plan to the live website, not design from a blank slate.
Gewerkton says the agents worked in a separate code copy and branch. Meyer reviewed and released each stage; films featuring the apps were held until he had approved the interface, and paid film reruns required separate approval. Apple’s iPhone build also waited for Meyer to accept an updated Program License Agreement, an action the company says only he could take.
Case study · AI-assisted product release · Oct 2–3, 2026
How Gewerkton Brought AI Agents Into Its Two-Day Brand Rebuild
Gewerkton says AI coding agents carried out its HORIZON redesign across apps, Studio, icons and a 529-page multilingual website. Founder Thorsten Meyer approved plans, reviewed the work and released each stage.
A rebuild across the product surface
HORIZON changed the visual system and its applications. The reported work reached interfaces, app releases, 3D-rendered icons and regional marketing content.
Tokens and 47 cards
281 hard-coded color values moved to design tokens, with 11 exceptions retained. The company says it checked 200 views across four languages, three screen widths and both themes.
Version 0.5.0
The refreshed iPhone and Android apps were part of the rollout. Gewerkton reports 853 of 853 tests passed for the phone app.
Light and dark modes
The HORIZON look extended into Studio, with the company reporting 2,158 of 2,158 tests passed.
26 Blender renders
All 26 icons were re-rendered to match the new brand. A dark-mode icon problem escaped automated checks and was caught during visual review.
529 pages · 40 languages
Eight help videos and regional content were included. The company says 222 of 228 film runs had their own regional version.
228 film runs
Work covered five regions. After failures and recoloring mistakes, some files were corrected, substituted or reshot after review.
Human review shaped the release
Agents handled implementation from written plans. Meyer retained decision, inspection, access and publication gates throughout the process.
Start from a draft
A Sept 26 interim design informed the approved HORIZON plan.
Implement in a branch
Agents worked in a separate code copy and branch, following the written plan.
Inspect the results
Meyer checked visual work and intervened when tests missed defects.
Approve and release
Each stage required release; paid film reruns needed separate approval.
“The two days cover the execution, from the approved plan to the live website.”
ThorstenMeyerAI.com · publisher account
“Nothing was merged or delivered until Meyer had released that part.”
ThorstenMeyerAI.com · release process
“Production was paused after round nine because 38 percent of jobs were failing.”
ThorstenMeyerAI.com · film production
Passing tests were only one signal
The company reports broad automated and browser checks alongside defects found by people, unresolved failures and follow-up work.
Reported verification
- Web views checked at 390, 834 and 1,440 pixels, in four languages and light/dark modes; no overflow or console errors were reported in those views.
- Phone app: 853/853 tests passed. Studio: 2,158/2,158 tests passed.
- Website: seven test suites, browser checks across three widths and five regions, then another check after upload.
- Films were reviewed visually, including the middle frame of 157 mirrored films and reworked cuts at 10%, 50% and 90%.
What the numbers say—and leave open
The source is Gewerkton’s publisher, which discloses that it built the product. Figures are company-reported, not independently audited.
Film production paused after round nine when 38% of jobs were failing. Gewerkton says 76 failed jobs were not billed, 24 files were cleaned, 10 regional versions temporarily used the European cut, and nine runs were later reshot with approval. The account does not provide a complete final film correction tally or full project cost; the supplied cost detail ends at “about 134 dollars actual.”
Open items after launch
The release account leaves several outcomes and measures unresolved, so its two-day claim describes an implementation window rather than a finished design process.
Version 0.5.1
Five findings were scheduled for a follow-up release. No ship date or confirmation appears in the account.
Eight test failures
The existing failures remain unresolved or undocumented in the report.
Cost and final outcomes
No full cost breakdown or complete account of film corrections is provided. There is no independent quality assessment.
A release chain with human gates
The reported workflow connects agent implementation to explicit review and approval before each release.
Human Review Shaped the Release
The account matters because it describes where AI agents fit in a real product release: agents performed implementation from written plans, while a person kept authority over decisions, visual inspection and publication. The workflow did not remove human work. Meyer approved the plan, checked results and handled access and spending gates; visual review also caught defects that automated checks missed.
Gewerkton’s reported figures suggest the scope was broader than a logo refresh, spanning product interfaces, mobile releases, a multilingual website and a large batch of marketing films. But the details come from a disclosure by the product’s publisher, which says it built Gewerkton itself. The figures are the company’s account, not an independent audit or a controlled comparison of agent-led and conventional work. The report offers a case study of the process, not proof that the same speed or quality can be expected elsewhere.
The release also shows the limits of treating passing tests as a complete quality measure. A dark-mode icon problem escaped tests and was noticed by Meyer, while film recolouring mistakes required human viewing. The company’s account pairs successful test totals with acknowledged failures and scheduled fixes, illustrating why human review remained part of the release process.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Draft to Live Release
Gewerkton is a construction-site documentation tool built in Iffeldorf, Bavaria, by Thorsten Meyer, who says he directs a group of AI coding agents using Codex and Claude. The source account was published by ThorstenMeyerAI.com and includes a disclosure that Gewerkton is built by its publisher. That relationship is relevant when weighing the project’s reported results.
The design work did not begin on Oct. 2: an interim draft from Sept. 26 informed the approved plan. For the web app, the company says 281 hard-coded colour values were moved to design tokens, with 11 exceptions retained. It reports checking 200 views in four languages, at widths of 390, 834 and 1,440 pixels, in light and dark modes. The stated checks found no overflow or console errors in those views.
Gewerkton reports that the phone app passed 853 of 853 tests and Studio passed 2,158 of 2,158. The website passed seven test suites and was checked in a browser across three widths and five regions; the live site was tested again after upload. The web app’s test suite still had eight failures across seven files. The company says six files fail the same way on the main branch and another test depends on run order, so it attributes those failures to existing issues rather than the redesign. It also says the redesign did not fix them.
““The two days cover the execution, from the approved plan to the live website.””
— ThorstenMeyerAI.com, Gewerkton’s publisher
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Remaining Bugs and Open Questions
The account does not provide an independent assessment of the reported schedule, test results, agent contributions or final quality. It also does not specify the full cost of the redesign. The supplied material ends after saying film records show “about 134 dollars actual” and does not give a complete cost breakdown or clarify what that figure includes.
Some issues remained after release. The company says an Android test on a Pixel 10a found five major, non-blocking findings, including camera-screen buttons that broke across words after larger type and padding were introduced. All five were scheduled for version 0.5.1, but the source does not confirm whether that update has since shipped. The eight web-app test failures also remain unresolved in the account.
Film production had its own limits: after a pause prompted by a 38% job failure rate, 76 failed jobs were not billed, according to Gewerkton. Visual checks found recolouring errors missed by the automated mask. The source says 24 files were cleaned, 10 regional versions were temporarily switched to the European cut, and nine runs were later reshot with Meyer’s approval. It does not provide a complete final accounting of every film correction or the total project cost.
multilingual website management software
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Android Fixes and Film Follow-Up
Gewerkton said the five Android findings were scheduled for version 0.5.1. The company’s account does not confirm a release date or whether the fixes are now live. Readers should treat that version as a stated next step, rather than a completed update.
The film work required additional review and selected reruns. Gewerkton says nine runs were reshot after approval and passed visual checks, following a wider review that included inspecting the middle frame of 157 mirrored films and watching reworked films again at 10%, 50% and 90% of their length. The source does not say whether further reruns are planned.
Beyond those items, no broader next milestone is specified. The immediate follow-up is whether the company releases the Android fixes, resolves or documents the web test failures, and publishes a fuller account of costs and final production outcomes. Until then, the reported two-day result remains a company-described implementation period with a pre-existing design draft and continuing follow-up work.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What did Gewerkton change in the two-day rebuild?
Gewerkton says it applied the HORIZON design to its web app, iPhone and Android apps, Studio, 26 icons and website, which spans 529 pages in 40 languages. The website work also included 228 AI film runs for five regions and eight help videos.
Did the design work begin on Oct. 2?
No. The company says an interim design draft from Sept. 26 was carried into the project. The Oct. 2–3 timeframe refers to execution from an approved plan through the live website.
Did AI agents make the release decisions?
According to Gewerkton, agents carried out implementation from written plans, but Thorsten Meyer approved the plan, reviewed results and released each part. He also approved paid film reruns and completed an Apple agreement step needed for the iPhone build.
What problems were found during the rebuild?
Meyer spotted icon tiles that obscured labels in dark mode, a problem that tests had not flagged. The company also reports film recolouring errors, a 38% failure rate at one point in production, eight web-app test failures it says were not caused by the redesign, and five non-blocking Android findings scheduled for version 0.5.1.
How much did the project cost?
The supplied account does not provide a complete project cost. It states that film records show “about 134 dollars actual” but ends before clarifying the scope of that figure or giving a full breakdown. Gewerkton also says 76 failed film jobs were not billed.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
